Cracking The Code Of Developer Creativity

There are a lot of stereotypes about developers: We sleep during the day, coding only by the light of the moon. We’re brilliant but anti-social technology geeks. We’re robot-like code drones, devoid of creativity. While I concede there may be a kernel of truth to the first two, I take serious umbrage with the third.

Coding is creating—and developers are, at their core, amazingly creative problem solvers. That is, we can be amazingly creative problem solvers under the right circumstances.

Unfortunately, there are times when the very nature of what we do gets in the way. For example, we’re often called upon to deliver the same routine functionality—say, an information intake form—for use in different applications. This is a necessary element of what we do, but think of it like this: If you were a writer, would you want to write the same story over and over again? Probably not. Because where’s the creativity in that?

It’s the same for us developers: Coding the same basic components keeps us from doing what we really want to do, which is to find new ways to solve people’s problems.


A quick primer on low-code

For those who don’t know, low-code development makes it possible for pretty much anyone to build an application. Using graphically based, drag-and-drop technology, people can assemble an app using pre-coded components.

Are these citizen developers suddenly coders? No. Can they create enterprise-wide business apps that work across multiple functions? No—at least not without the support of IT. But can they create simple apps that solve their problems using pre-coded functionality found in most business applications? Yes. Absolutely. And there’s no reason low-code can’t be used to help developers spend less time reinventing the wheel, and more time creating cool stuff.


Less-than-perfect process

Let’s start by looking at the typical, less-than-perfect process of how a business application gets made:

An IT department uses a shared email address to intake app requests and then tracks those requests, their approvals, and fulfillment through a shared spreadsheet. Already, there’s a lack of visibility on the part of the requester and other stakeholders, coupled with a high-touch, time-consuming fulfillment process.

Then someone needs to manually identify the people responsible for approvals and send approval emails to those contacts. They then need to collect the approval information, update the spreadsheet, and perform whatever work is required to fulfill the request.

Then, work is done in an entirely different software platform that has an API that can be consumed. Finally, an update is sent to the requester via email when the work is completed.


The process—spanning multiple people and platforms—is already clunky. And we haven’t even made it to development yet. Once a developer comes into the picture, they would have to:

Create a database to store requests and metadata, such as who approves which type of request and which groups each request needs to be routed to.

Add security to this database, so the appropriate people have the appropriate level of access.

Create an intake form hosted on a portal somewhere, which a requester would fill out and create a record in the request table.

Create automation that notifies the requester that their request has been received, handles the approval process, and assigns the request to the correct fulfillment group.

Create an integration that consumes the third-party API and sends the data.

As a developer, I’m most interested in the higher-complexity piece of this project—the integration. But I’m going to have to slog through the first four steps to get there. This means going back and forth with the stakeholders or business analysts on what the forms need to look like and the wording of emails, amongst other things.

This streamlines the entire process, freeing the developer to focus on the more complex integration, which is what we’re more interested in anyway.


Enter citizen development

In organizations with functional citizen developer programs, a non-IT employee can use a low-code platform to take care of the steps that are important, but better suited for someone closer to the business requirements of the project. Low-code would allow that person to create the data model with security, build an intake form, and deploy it to the correct portal. They can then use an automation tool to automate email sending, approvals, and request routing.

This streamlines the entire process, freeing the developer to focus on the more complex integration, which is what we’re more interested in anyway.

When developers can focus on one thing—knowing they won’t need to worry about going back and forth around form design or notification wording—they can be more creative in solving that one complex problem.

By removing the rote and mundane aspects of the project, developers are free to dig their teeth into the more creative aspects of our jobs. Not only does this unlock creativity, it lets developers focus on high-value technical challenges, rather than repetitive tasks that can be offloaded to citizen developers.

People get the apps they want. Developers get to create cool things. And problems get solved quickly with less stress all around. To sum it all up: low-code is the development solution we’ve all been waiting for.


RELATED: https://smartstreamit.blogspot.com/

https://smartstreamhd.blogspot.com/

https://infonewsviewers.blogspot.com/

https://media-streamit.blogspot.com/

https://mockbusterlive.blogspot.com/

https://monthjulymovi.blogspot.com/

https://gumaceng21.blogspot.com/


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Return of the Weird Blockbuster

Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness raises the question: Is Sam Raimi the best director to ever be attached to a Marvel movie? He doesn’t have an Oscar like Chloé Zhao or Taika Waititi, the sorts of filmmakers who, if nothing else, win Oscars (their movies really make you think). He doesn’t typically do prestige, and he avoids serious subject matter. But Raimi is also a singularly kinetic visual storyteller—a true showman—and, in his way, a transformational figure in the recent history of American cinema. When Raimi directed the first (and arguably best) Spider-Man in 2002, comic-book properties were a volatile prospect, if not an all-out gamble. The Joel Schumacher Batman movies were a pop-culture punch line, and R-rated Bayhem was all the rage. That Spider-Man surpassed even the most optimistic box-office expectations is only part of the story, however. The fact that a major studio would entrust such a valuable title to a guy like Raimi—whose most famous movie to that point f
Read more

Batman Beyond Settles Tony Stark vs Bruce Wayne

Since both characters are billionaires without inherent superpowers who use their wealth to develop a method to fight evil in their respective worlds, the debate over who is better between Batman and Iron Man has raged for decades—but an issue of Batman Beyond proves that Iron Man is superior. Tony Stark first became Iron Man after he was captured as a prisoner of war and developed a suit that could keep him alive following a nearly fatal injury. Since then, he continuously created better versions of his original design until he was successful in developing an entire army of his suits that he can control remotely in what's known as the Iron Legion. Bruce Wayne, on the other hand, refined his body and mind rather than just his suit upon his entrance into the superhero world. Bruce trained with the greatest masters of basically every kind of martial art to make himself the pinnacle of what human beings are capable of. However, in the neo-tech future of Batman Beyond, Bruce is a lot o
Read more

Release and Streaming Play Set Firm Day Theatrical to Italy

A move that will transform Italy’s relationship with Netflix, the Italian government has set a firm three-month time window between a movie’s theatrical release and when it can drop on a streaming platform. The announcement was made by Italian Culture Minister Dario Franceschini during a Rome confab on the state of the country’s film industry held by the country’s motion picture association ANICA. The minister said he has signed a law that will extend the existing 90-day theatrical window for Italian films that had benefitted from government subsidies to now include all films, regardless of where they are produced or how they are financed. Due to its having a more flexible windowing policy than France, Italy in recent years has been an interesting testing ground for the theatrical releases of Netflix titles, largely because the Venice Film Festival is a frequent launching pad for the platform’s original films. Here I will inform you of the films that have just been released and can be
Read more